Under the PRC legal framework, the acquisition of private companies differs from the acquisition of public companies in many aspects. Since the acquisition of public companies may affect the interest of public investors, such acquisitions are subject to more stringent regulatory rules and regulations, particularly in relation to information disclosure obligations, regulatory thresholds, acquisition methods, the role of intermediaries, and the impact of foreign investment considerations.
As to information disclosure, while parties to the acquisition of private companies may negotiate and close the transaction in private (without disclosing the transaction process and the terms and conditions of the transaction documents to the public), parties to acquisition of public companies shall prepare and disclose certain disclosure documents, which must provide sufficient details regarding the compliance and commercial rationale of the transaction, the acquirer’s industry experience and governance capabilities, and the protective measures for minority shareholders. Regulatory authorities are particularly alert to attempts to circumvent disclosure obligations, avoid tender offer requirements, or structure voting rights arrangements in a manner that frustrates the intent of the regulatory framework.
Acquisitions of public companies are subject to the so-called “shareholding ratio trigger thresholds” (which does not apply to acquisition of private companies), i.e., once an investor (including and together with other parties acting in concert with such investor) acquire 5% of the issued shares, it must file a report with the regulatory authorities and make a public announcement, and if the aggregate shareholding reaches or exceeds 30%, any further acquisition of shares must be conducted by way of a mandatory tender offer.
The role of intermediaries also differs considerably. In private company acquisitions, advisers typically provide only legal or financial advisory support. By contrast, in public company acquisitions, the engagement of independent financial advisers, PRC law firms, and accounting firms is mandatory. Such intermediaries are required to conduct due diligence and issue public professional opinions, thereby assuming a higher level of compliance responsibility.
Foreign investors may participate in the acquisition of both private companies and public companies, provided that the industry of the target company doesn’t fall into the negative list for foreign investment, or the relevant special management measures set forth in said negative list shall apply. Moreover, in acquisition of public companies, foreign investors are subject to more legal or commercial requirements or limitations, for example, if a foreign investor intends to purchase the controlling stake of a PRC A-share-listed company, it must possess real assets of not less than US$100 million or assets under management of not less than US$500 million (the requirements for controlling shareholders remain unchanged), and after the acquisition, the foreign investor is subject to a 12-month lock-up period, during which foreign investors may not transfer, gift, or pledge their A-shares, nor may they exercise dividend or voting rights unless the regulatory conditions are satisfied.
For private company acquisitions, the key documents typically include the equity transfer agreement, asset purchase agreement, due diligence report, and the relevant resolutions of shareholders and the board of directors. If the transaction involves state-owned assets, an asset valuation report is also required. In cases of foreign investment, the acquirer must additionally submit a foreign investment information reporting form.
Acquisitions of public companies demand more formalized and extensive documentation. Required materials generally include the acquisition report, shareholding change report, tender offer report, independent financial adviser’s report, legal opinion from a PRC law firm, special audit or valuation report prepared by certified public accountants, and all public announcements issued through the stock exchange.
In private company acquisitions in China, there is no statutory obligation to disclose information publicly. Nevertheless, transaction documents typically require the seller to disclose all material matters, such as significant liabilities, pending disputes, tax exposures, environmental compliance obligations, data security concerns, and labor issues, through representations, warranties, and disclosure schedules. This contractual approach effectively substitutes for regulatory oversight and serves as a risk allocation mechanism between the parties.
For public company acquisitions, disclosure requirements are much more comprehensive under PRC securities law. These include detailed information about the acquirer, the commercial rationale for the transaction, financing arrangements, shareholding structures, consideration, post-acquisition plans, governance changes, and any arrangements with concert parties or material corporate restructurings.
In the PRC capital markets, the tender offer framework is designed to ensure fair treatment of investors and maintain orderly market operations. While most M&A transactions in practice involve private companies—including those with foreign investors—public company acquisitions are subject to more structured tender offer rules.
Under PRC law, mandatory tender offers are triggered when an investor, together with its concert parties, acquires control of a listed company. Voluntary tender offers may be made for a minimum 5% stake, with the offer price, payment security, and permissible forms of consideration governed by PRC securities regulations.
Exemptions from mandatory tender offers may apply in exceptional circumstances, such as intra-group restructurings or acquisitions of financially distressed targets that have shareholder-approved restructuring plans. Offerors are generally required to provide adequate security for the offer, commonly through cash deposits, bank guarantees, or escrow arrangements, which are verified by an independent financial adviser to ensure compliance and protect investor interests.
The most frequently employed structure in M&A transactions is the acquisition of equity interests. The acquirer purchases part or all the target’s equity by entering into an equity transfer agreement. For private companies, such transfers are typically implemented through shareholder agreements and registration of changes with the competent Administration for Market Regulation, offering relatively flexible procedures.
Where the acquirer seeks to acquire specific assets—such as operating assets, intellectual property, or equipment—parties execute an asset purchase agreement. Completion generally requires re-registration of relevant property rights with the competent Administration for Market Regulation and may also involve the transfer or assumption of related liabilities. Listed companies often use share consideration for asset acquisitions, which may trigger review under the material asset restructuring rules if thresholds are met. In contrast, asset acquisitions involving private companies are generally not subject to public market regulation, with primary focus on taxation, debt assumption, and contractual assignments.
Mergers represent another significant structure, whether through absorption into an existing entity or by establishing a new entity. Upon completion, mergers must be registered with the Administration for Market Regulation. This approach is often used for business integration or to adjust shareholder structures. Mergers or reorganizations involving public companies are subject to mandatory disclosure and review by the CSRC or NEEQ, ensuring minority shareholder protection. Private company mergers are primarily shareholder-level arrangements, with comparatively flexible procedures.
Regarding SPACs, although common internationally for reverse mergers, this model has not yet been introduced to China’s A-share market. In China, the primary method for backdoor listings is a restructuring listing, whereby a listed company issues shares to acquire equity or assets of an unlisted company, thereby enabling the target to become part of the listed company. Transactions resulting in fundamental changes to a listed company’s business or control, and meeting size thresholds, are treated as backdoor listings and subject to IPO-level regulatory scrutiny. Private company acquisitions, by contrast, generally require only registration with the Administration for Market Regulation and are not subject to IPO-equivalent review, resulting in lower procedural and compliance burdens.
In M&A transactions, the structuring of consideration not only balances the interests of the parties but also directly affects execution efficiency and post-closing integration outcomes.
Earn-out arrangements are frequently used to resolve valuation differences. When the parties hold different expectations regarding the target’s future performance, a portion of the consideration is linked to post-closing business results. Additional payments are usually contingent on achieving specified EBITDA, revenue, or key business milestones within a defined period. This mechanism bridges valuation gaps while incentivizing the target’s management team to drive sustained performance. Private company transactions generally allow greater flexibility in structuring consideration, often incorporating earn-outs or performance-based arrangements for post-closing adjustments.
M&A transactions in China are commonly subject to mandatory approvals or filings, including the following:
Antitrust Review: Transactions that meet the filing thresholds for a concentration of undertakings must be notified to the antitrust enforcement authority and obtain clearance before implementation. Article 3 of the Provisions of the State Council on the Notification Thresholds for Concentrations of Undertakings, promulgated in January 2024, raises the thresholds as follows: the combined global turnover of all undertakings participating in the concentration in the preceding fiscal year has been increased from RMB 10 billion to RMB 12 billion, or their combined domestic turnover from RMB 2 billion to RMB 4 billion; and the threshold requiring at least two undertakings to have each achieved domestic turnover in excess of RMB 400 million has been increased to RMB 800 million.
For private company transactions, regulatory conditions precedent are generally limited to registration with the Administration for Market Regulation, foreign investment access, and industry-specific licensing approvals.
In addition to regulatory clearances, commercial conditions precedent commonly included in M&A contracts are:
In Chinese M&A transactions, the scope and standard of representations and warranties are typically defined by the parties’ express agreement. Knowledge is often construed as facts that the seller actually knows or reasonably should have known, while materiality is assessed based on whether the facts or circumstances would substantially affect the purchaser’s investment decision. This negotiated allocation balances contractual certainty with practical risk management.
Bring-down provisions, which ensure that representations and warranties remain true at closing, are rare in Chinese transactions. Similar effects are usually achieved through conditions precedent, closing confirmations, or price adjustments for material changes. The focus is on due diligence, disclosure, and regulatory compliance rather than formal bring-down clauses.
Unlike in some common law jurisdictions, PRC law does not prohibit “sandbagging.” Consequently, parties often agree that even if the purchaser is aware of a breach prior to closing, remedies based on contractual representations and warranties remain available. Explicitly addressing this in the agreement has become standard market practice to prevent post-closing disputes.
Guarantee mechanisms are indispensable in M&A contracts to secure payment of consideration and mitigate risks arising from seller default or inaccurate disclosures. Common approaches in China include:
Indemnification caps are generally set at 10–30% of the transaction consideration, though high-risk or sensitive industries may see caps up to 50%. Contracts often include a de minimis clause to exclude minor claims, and liability typically activates only when cumulative losses reach a predefined basket amount, enhancing efficiency.
Indemnification is usually subject to limits such as caps, de minimis thresholds, deductibles, and basket arrangements. These limit liability scope while maintaining adequate protection for the buyer.
Coverage often includes tax arrears, labor compliance disputes, environmental penalties, data compliance issues, undisclosed litigation, and other compliance risks. The Kangmei Pharmaceutical fraud case (2019–2021), where executives and independent directors bore substantial liability, underscores the importance of carefully designing representations, warranties, and indemnification provisions.
M&A contracts may stipulate foreign law, but mandatory provisions under Chinese law—such as securities law, foreign investment review, or antitrust rules—must be observed.
For dispute resolution, domestic transactions typically opt for litigation in Chinese courts or CIETAC arbitration, balancing enforceability and confidentiality. Private company disputes often involve equity transfers or contract performance issues, where arbitration is preferred to protect trade secrets.
Ally Law is not a law firm. By providing information to Ally Law through this website or otherwise communicating information to Ally Law, you are not establishing an attorney-client relationship with Ally Law or with any independent local firms that participate in Ally Law. The information you provide us will not be afforded legal protection as an attorney-client communication. This means that while Ally Law will protect the confidentiality in accordance with the policy described above, the information you provide is not protected under the laws relating to attorney-client privilege, and Ally Law may be compelled to disclose information you provide in certain legal proceedings. Accordingly, you should not provide any information concerning your legal needs you wish to be protected by attorney-client privilege.
2107–2112, Office Tower E2 Oriental Plaza, No.1 East Chang An Avenue, Beijing,
China
Call: 8610 8541 9666
2411, Citi Group Tower, No.33 Huayuanshiqiao Rd, Shanghai,
China
Call: 8621 6859 0516
2101, China Huarun Building, Shenzhen,
China
Call: 8675 5269 10043
3/F, YATTER International Convention Center, No.7, Changbin 1st Road, Haikou,
China
Call: 8610 8587 6157
Ning Zhu
Managing Partner (Beijing)
Email: ning.zhu@chancebridge.com
Call: 8610 8587 0075
Edward Luo
Partner
Email: edward.luo@chancebridge.com
Call: 8621 6859 0516
Min Lin
Associate
Email: min.lin@chancebridge.com
Call: 8610 8587 0068
